Difference between SVN & GIT

Subversion (SVN) and Git are both popular version control systems used to manage source code and track changes. Here are some key differences between SVN and Git:

1. Distributed vs. Centralized: Git is a distributed version control system, which means that every developer has a complete copy of the repository on their local machine. In contrast, SVN is a centralized system, where there is a single repository that everyone works from.

2. Branching and Merging: Git makes it very easy to create and manage branches, and merging changes from one branch to another is also straightforward. SVN also supports branching and merging, but it can be more difficult to manage.

3. Speed: Git is generally faster than SVN, especially when it comes to operations like cloning a repository, committing changes, and switching between branches.

4. Handling Large Files: Git is optimized for handling large files, while SVN can struggle with files that are larger than a few hundred megabytes.

5. Learning Curve: Git has a steeper learning curve than SVN, especially for developers who are used to working with centralized version control systems.

6. Availability: Git is an open-source tool, while SVN is also open-source but maintained by Apache. Git has wider support and is available on more platforms than SVN.

7. Merge Conflicts: Git makes it easier to resolve merge conflicts, which can occur when two or more developers make changes to the same file at the same time. SVN, on the other hand, can sometimes require more manual intervention to resolve conflicts.

Overall, both SVN and Git have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs of the project and the preferences of the development team.